Why risk managers should resist headline-driven volatility narratives and concentrate on controls, resilience and learning.
The attention trap
The original essay argues that availability bias, attention economics and the speed of commentary can exaggerate perceptions of unprecedented volatility. This is an argument about prioritisation and perspective, not a claim that geopolitical or macroeconomic shocks are irrelevant.
Fix the operational fundamentals
The article prioritises proven resilience against important-business-service disruption, third- and fourth-party dependencies, change and technology debt, usable management information, AI governance and fit-for-purpose GRC tools.
Build resilience instead of relying on prediction
Maintain appropriate buffers, diverse dependencies and rehearsed playbooks, including decision rights, escalation triggers and communication. External shocks should be converted into scenarios against which preparedness can be tested.
Keep geopolitical scenarios proportionate
The original suggests maintaining three or four regularly refreshed scenarios that link external developments to concrete financial and operational consequences, and exercising them across functions such as Operations, Treasury and Communications.
Use a small set of indicators that matter
Focus on a manageable set of leading and lagging KRIs, including the quality of governance challenge, third-party exit exercises, model reviews, recurring root causes and delayed actions. Ask what changed, why it matters and what the organisation has done about it.
Learning and correction are the advantage
The conclusion emphasises intellectual humility, error detection and disciplined learning. Avoid treating forecasts as certainty; improve controls and recovery capability in response to actual weaknesses and incidents.
Related Academy Insight: ORM — Back to Basics: 10 Fundamentals →